<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good DVCPROHD on Final Cut workflow article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/</link>
	<description>Jesse Rosen's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8#comment-820</guid>
		<description>I have question regarding capturing from the 1200A into final cut pro 5.1.1 via firewire.  I'm watching my dailies on a 23" apple display and it seems that audio is about 9 frames late.  When recording from the deck w/headphones connected to the deck, audio seems to be in sync.  any suggestion?  deck settings to adjust for capture offset or fcp capture offset?
Thanks,
Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have question regarding capturing from the 1200A into final cut pro 5.1.1 via firewire.  I&#8217;m watching my dailies on a 23&#8243; apple display and it seems that audio is about 9 frames late.  When recording from the deck w/headphones connected to the deck, audio seems to be in sync.  any suggestion?  deck settings to adjust for capture offset or fcp capture offset?<br />
Thanks,<br />
Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8#comment-168</guid>
		<description>What problems are you having? I think that tri-level shouldn't be necessary, as everything should sync properly to black burst. (Well not the camera, but the 1200 and the I/O do.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What problems are you having? I think that tri-level shouldn&#8217;t be necessary, as everything should sync properly to black burst. (Well not the camera, but the 1200 and the I/O do.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8#comment-167</guid>
		<description>New subject. What are your thoughts on tri-level sync for post production HD. We have a few issues with our 1200A, AJA I/O and FCP5 and we were looking at a master Tri-level sync to stabilize our system. We only have one Varicam and we never do multi-cam HD. 
Later, 
Ray Palmer
Phoenix, AZ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New subject. What are your thoughts on tri-level sync for post production HD. We have a few issues with our 1200A, AJA I/O and FCP5 and we were looking at a master Tri-level sync to stabilize our system. We only have one Varicam and we never do multi-cam HD.<br />
Later,<br />
Ray Palmer<br />
Phoenix, AZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Phil: It's true that the 1200 deck isn't an editing deck, meaning it can't do insert or assembly editing. It is a perfectly good record deck for crash edits, however, and fortunately that is all that is needed in this case for outputing from Final Cut. Unlike in every other format I've tried, FCP will actually output embedded timecode in DVCPRO HD over firewire, so as long as the deck is set to take external timecode you end up with a perfectly usable master. Better in fact than using the 1700 VTR, since it re-imbeds the variable-frame flags in the output signal, so you can recapture the footage at 24 through firewire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil: It&#8217;s true that the 1200 deck isn&#8217;t an editing deck, meaning it can&#8217;t do insert or assembly editing. It is a perfectly good record deck for crash edits, however, and fortunately that is all that is needed in this case for outputing from Final Cut. Unlike in every other format I&#8217;ve tried, FCP will actually output embedded timecode in DVCPRO HD over firewire, so as long as the deck is set to take external timecode you end up with a perfectly usable master. Better in fact than using the 1700 VTR, since it re-imbeds the variable-frame flags in the output signal, so you can recapture the footage at 24 through firewire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Parrish</title>
		<link>http://www.bustedskull.com/2005/03/10/good-dvcprohd-on-final-cut-workflow-article/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Parrish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Andrew,
Undoubtedly someone from Panasonic has notified you of this already but just in case the 1200A is not an edit/record deck. While it may be possible to output a sequence to this machine it was not designed for editing. It's primary design was for digitizing to non-linear edit systems. Of course the AJ-HD1700 studio VTR is the necessary deck to output to but it will set you back $60,000.00. So much for an inexpensive workflow.
Regards,
Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
Undoubtedly someone from Panasonic has notified you of this already but just in case the 1200A is not an edit/record deck. While it may be possible to output a sequence to this machine it was not designed for editing. It&#8217;s primary design was for digitizing to non-linear edit systems. Of course the AJ-HD1700 studio VTR is the necessary deck to output to but it will set you back $60,000.00. So much for an inexpensive workflow.<br />
Regards,<br />
Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
